Google security and privacy issues. Close-up of Google logo with a fingerprint icon isolated on a pink background. Google’s ‘fingerprinting’ furore: has Big G gone too far?
Credit: Shutterstock, TY Lim
Privacy critics are outraged this week over Google’s latest move to allow ‘fingerprinting’, a clever – but controversial – technique that tracks users across devices more doggedly than ever before. Campaigners say the search giant has crossed the line in what they call ‘a blatant disregard for user privacy.’ But is it all just a storm in a teacup – or the start of an online Big Brother?
Finger on the pulse: What’s changed?
On Sunday, February 16, Google officially permitted advertisers to collect extra snippets of user data – ranging from IP addresses to the make and model of your smartphone or TV box. The idea is to help target adverts more effectively when the usual cookie crumbs won’t do the trick.
Google insists other firms already track you in this way, and says it’s simply encouraging ‘responsible data use’. But rewind to 2019, and the Silicon Valley titan was singing a very different tune, calling fingerprinting ‘wrong’ in a blog post. That about-face has left many privacy watchers crying foul.
What is ‘fingerprinting’?
Imagine every keystroke you tap, every video you watch, and every app you open is being quietly observed – not by some secret spy in a trench coat, but by the very websites you rely on every single day. That’s fingerprinting in a nutshell: a stealthy technique that pieces together the tiniest clues about your device, from your screen size to your battery percentage, until the AI builds an eerily accurate profile of you.
It’s like having a digital stalker trailing your every online move – without leaving a single cookie crumb behind. You don’t see any pop-ups, there’s no friendly ‘Accept or Reject’ button to click. Once this precious data is harvested, it can be passed around among advertisers, data brokers, and others, forming a deep dossier on your online habits.
This means you could be labelled, tracked, and scrutinised anywhere you go on the web – potentially for years – without having so much as tapped ‘I agree’ to any of it. Feeling a little paranoid now? Good. That’s fingerprinting.
Google putting ‘profit over privacy’?
Furious campaigners say the new rule change cements Google’s dominance by hooking into personal data we can’t easily hide or delete.
The UK’s data watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), isn’t mincing its words. It slammed Google’s new move in a December blog post, calling fingerprinting “not a fair means of tracking users” and labelling Google’s green light as “irresponsible”.
Regulators say companies must still follow UK data protection rules, a task they reckon is ‘a high bar to meet’ if firms start embracing fingerprinting.
Where does this leave you?
Google’s new policy has sparked a privacy firestorm, with critics slamming the tech giant for moving the goalposts and apparently reneging on a 2019 promise to shun fingerprinting. The company counters that it’s just aligning with industry practice – and even claims it’s all in the name of safety, not snooping.
With Google’s deep pockets and the advertising world hungry for ever more data, the fingerprinting debate is far from settled. Whether you see it as business as usual or a brazen invasion of privacy, the heat is definitely on.
Is Google’s fingerprinting a step too far? You decide.
Read more original news in English from around Europe.
Read more news in English from around Spain.
