Douglas County plans to seek home-rule power to counter what it says is state government overreach

Douglas County is embarking on a nearly yearlong effort to establish home-rule authority — a power that leaders in the conservative suburban county hope to wield as a defensive weapon against what they consider legislative overreach by state lawmakers.

In recent years, the county south of Denver has engaged in a series of legal battles with the state over property tax valuations, state immigration laws and the validity of public health orders, like mask mandates during the coronavirus pandemic. The county has filed lawsuits and issued declarations of dissent against Colorado’s Democratic leadership.

Now its leaders will ask voters to beef up its standing.

Establishing home-rule authority “will allow us to keep what we have and allow us to push back on the state on things we really care about in this county,” Commissioner George Teal told The Denver Post. “We like to talk about local control in this state, and yet the mechanism for local control is home rule. Let’s put our money where our mouth is.”

The board of commissioners adopted a resolution Tuesday that will kickstart Douglas County’s transition from a statutory form of government to home-rule status. That authority imbues local governments in Colorado — typically cities and towns — with specific powers to run their own affairs.

The effort will include the establishment of a 21-member charter commission — which requires the approval of voters at a June 24 special election — to draw up the county’s home-rule charter. Voters will then be asked to approve the charter this November.

If the measure passes, home-rule authority will take effect on Jan. 1.

Douglas County would become just the fifth of the state’s 64 counties to possess home-rule authority. The others are Denver, Broomfield, Weld and Pitkin counties.

The state maintains preeminence over matters of statewide concern, county attorney Jeff Garcia said Tuesday, but home-rule power gives local governments a better chance of asserting local control over issues like taxation, land use, zoning and governance structure.

“Home rule gives you enhanced standing to challenge the state,” Garcia said.

Last year alone, Douglas County sued the state Board of Equalization over the board’s decision to overrule the county’s attempt to provide $4 billion in property tax relief to its residents, while months later filing suit against the state over two immigration laws. Those laws limit the level of aid local law enforcement agencies can render to federal immigration authorities when it comes to the arrest and detention of migrants.

Earlier this year, just before President Donald Trump returned to office, Douglas County’s commissioners adopted a resolution backing his plans to deport immigrants living illegally in the country.

The county’s legal strategies haven’t found much success in the courts. A Denver judge dismissed much of Douglas County’s challenge on the property tax matter, while a different Denver judge struck down the county’s immigration lawsuit in December, ruling that the county didn’t have standing to bring the action against the state.

Home-rule authority, Garcia said, would give the county a better chance of prevailing in court because legal standing wouldn’t pose the same impediment as it does under statutory rule, where counties must follow state law to a tee.

“We’d be more than happy to have that argument in court,” he said.

County leaders even envision home-rule authority allowing them to set aside the state’s 10-cent grocery bag fee, which lawmakers mandated in a bill passed four years ago. Teal said he could see home-rule power being used to challenge gun-control laws being considered in the Capitol.

“When we get gun-control laws that come down, we’re going to have latitude,” the commissioner said. “When you talk about gun control, that’s a big issue for folks in Douglas County.”