Proposed taxes on mezzanine and most popular fairness financing, and a tax on high-value second properties in New York Metropolis (generally generally known as a “pied-à-terre” tax), weren’t included among the many revenue-raising measures adopted by the New York State lawmakers within the closing funds invoice adopted on Wednesday, April 7.
This isn’t the primary time these taxes have been proposed after which failed within the New York State legislature, and their proponents are prone to pursue efforts to revive them once more.
Late on Wednesday, April 7, the New York State legislature handed the State’s funds for the 2021-22 fiscal 12 months. The true property trade had been carefully following the funds course of, due in no small half to 2 proposed tax measures that will have imposed extra tax burdens on sure actual property property and transactions: the “mezzanine tax,” which might have subjected mezzanine and most popular fairness financing transactions to mortgage recording taxes (the Mezzanine Tax), and the “pied-à-terre” tax, which might have imposed extra taxes on high-value second properties in New York Metropolis (the Pied-à-terre Tax). Fortuitously for the trade, neither measure was included within the closing funds invoice that was finally adopted by the legislature.
The Mezzanine Tax would have imposed mortgage recording taxes on mezzanine and most popular fairness financing transactions (as excessive as 2.8 p.c in New York Metropolis for principal quantities of greater than $500,000). Adjustments had been additionally proposed to the New York Uniform Industrial Code (UCC), which might have been revised to offer that (1) treatments below the UCC wouldn’t be accessible to the mezzanine lender or most popular fairness investor until the mortgage recording tax is paid, and (2) a safety curiosity with respect to such mezzanine debt or most popular fairness funding could also be perfected provided that a UCC-1 financing assertion is filed. Moreover, the Pied-à-terre Tax would have approved New York Metropolis to impose extra actual property taxes on sure high-value properties not used as principal residences. Taxes would have been approved at charges of not lower than one-half p.c and less than 4 p.c for one-, two- and three-family residences, to be assessed on the portion of market worth thereof that exceeded $5 million), and never lower than 10 p.c and less than 13.5 p.c on condominium and co-op items, to be assessed on the portion of the assessed worth thereof that exceeded $300,000.
Though the Mezzanine Tax and Pied-à-terre Tax are stalled for now, the true property trade will proceed paying shut consideration to legislative developments, as each of those taxes have been proposed — and failed — earlier than within the New York State legislature, solely to rise once more. Proponents of the Mezzanine Tax and Pied-à-terre Tax will be anticipated to proceed to press for his or her enactment, and, the truth is, stand-alone payments for each the Mezzanine Tax (S3074 within the New York State Senate and A3139 within the New York State Meeting, each in committee as of this writing) and Pied-à-terre Tax (S4199 within the New York State Senate and A5736 within the New York State Meeting, each additionally in committee as of this writing) are energetic in each homes of the New York State legislature. Katten will proceed to observe developments with respect to the Mezzanine Tax and Pied-à-terre Tax, as they come up.
©2021 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNationwide Regulation Evaluation, Quantity XI, Quantity 99