Ukraine remains committed to peace efforts provided its sovereignty and territorial integrity are preserved. Photo credit: bella1105/Shutterstock
Ukraine has reportedly agreed to the core framework of a peace deal brokered by former US President Donald Trump, according to a senior American official. The agreement, still described as provisional, follows high-level discussions between US and Ukrainian negotiators, with further dialogue expected both in Washington and neutral diplomatic locations. While Kyiv has not publicly confirmed a final signature, officials indicate that the country has accepted the “essence” of the proposal, suggesting a notable shift after months of diplomatic stalemate.
The development arrives amid growing international pressure to bring the conflict towards a negotiated conclusion. Analysts warn that although progress is evident, major hurdles remain, particularly regarding territorial sovereignty, national security guarantees and Russia’s formal commitment to the framework.
What the proposed peace framework includes
From controversial draft to revised compromise
Early versions of the Trump-backed plan reportedly contained 28 points, several of which raised concerns among European leaders and Ukrainian officials. These included references to military restrictions, neutrality positioning and loosely defined territorial arrangements that critics viewed as potentially disadvantageous to Kyiv.
Following further negotiations, a revised document of approximately 19 points is said to have emerged, prioritising phased ceasefire implementation, international monitoring mechanisms, reconstruction funding and reinforced security guarantees. Ukrainian negotiators have described this version as a workable basis for continued discussion, rather than a conclusive settlement.
The updated framework reportedly delays final decisions on territorial status, instead prioritising immediate stabilisation and de-escalation measures supervised by international partners.
Kyiv’s reaction and political positioning
Support tempered by safeguards
President Volodymyr Zelensky has cautiously welcomed dialogue, reiterating that Ukraine remains committed to peace efforts provided its sovereignty and territorial integrity are preserved. Officials stress that any binding agreement must avoid undermining Ukraine’s defensive capacity or legitimising territorial occupation.
Kyiv continues to insist on the full participation of European allies in the negotiation and implementation process, seeking to balance diplomatic progress with reassurance to its military and civilian population.
What we know so far
- Ukrainian officials have accepted the core framework, but no final treaty has been signed.
- The proposal has shifted from a controversial 28-point draft to a moderated 19-point structure.
- Sensitive issues, including territorial control, remain unresolved.
- European leaders have expressed concern over the balance and legality of the plan.
- Russia has not yet publicly confirmed its position on the revised framework.
- Talks are expected to continue at both bilateral and international levels.
International response and global significance
Cautious optimism and diplomatic unease
European governments have responded carefully, stressing that peace must not come at the cost of international legal principles or Ukraine’s long-term security. Strategic analysts warn that poorly structured agreements risk creating fragile ceasefires and geopolitical instability rather than lasting peace.
Meanwhile, humanitarian organisations cautiously welcome renewed diplomatic engagement, highlighting the potential for reduced civilian suffering if genuine de-escalation is achieved.
A fragile path forward
As negotiations continue, the coming weeks will be critical in determining whether the proposed agreement evolves into a formal peace treaty or remains another unresolved diplomatic effort. With Russia’s stance still unclear and political sensitivities running high, international mediation and transparent dialogue will be decisive factors.
For now, the framework represents the most tangible movement towards peace in recent months, offering cautious hope while underscoring the complexities still ahead.
