Air India crash cockpit audio: Did a fuel switch blunder lead to the tragedy?

A new twist has emerged in the investigation into last month’s devastating Air India Flight 171 crash just outside Ahmedabad, and it all comes down to a few seconds of confusion in the cockpit.

Investigators have been combing through the cockpit voice recorder, and what they’ve found so far is raising eyebrows—not just among aviation experts, but also among ordinary passengers who put their trust in pilots every time they board a flight.

Let’s set the scene: it’s a regular day at Ahmedabad airport, and a Boeing 787 Dreamliner is preparing to depart for London Gatwick. On board are 241 passengers and crew, as well as Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder. The two pilots have flown together before, but no one could have predicted how this flight would end—crashing into a medical college less than a minute after take-off, killing nearly everyone on board as well as 19 people on the ground. One passenger somehow survived, but for most, the disaster unfolded in the blink of an eye.

Now, a report from the Wall Street Journal has shed fresh light on the moments before the airplane crash. According to sources who’ve reviewed the cockpit audio, there was a tense exchange between the pilots: First Officer Kunder was at the controls for take-off, but it was the captain, Sabharwal, who apparently reached for the fuel switches. The conversation, as reconstructed from the audio, has the co-pilot asking directly why the captain had flipped the fuel supply off—an action that left the engines starved of fuel just as the plane needed maximum power.

Split-second cockpit choices: How one decision led to Air India’s fatal crash

To the untrained eye, the fuel switches are just another pair of levers in the crowded Dreamliner cockpit. But for pilots, they’re critical. Set to “run” for take-off, moving them to “cutoff” cuts off fuel flow and, in this case, triggered an almost immediate loss of thrust from both engines. The report from India’s Air Accident Investigation Bureau says both switches were moved, just one second apart, in those crucial moments after take-off.

CCTV from the airport tells its own story: the backup power system kicked in as the plane lifted off, a sign that both engines had lost power. The jet managed to climb to about 650 feet before it started to sink. According to the data, the pilots tried to flip the switches back and the Dreamliner automatically attempted to restart its engines—but it was simply too late.

This is where the story gets murky. While the initial official report doesn’t say who moved which switch, the voice recording now suggests it was the captain. Investigators are still probing why—was it human error, a technical misunderstanding, or something more complicated? Either way, it’s a scenario that most pilots train for, but one that rarely happens in real life.

Pilots under the microscope: Blame game or fair investigation?

The fall-out has been swift and, for many in the aviation community, deeply uncomfortable. India’s Federation of Indian Pilots has already pushed back hard against the preliminary findings, accusing authorities of trying to pin the blame on the crew before all the facts are in. “Assigning blame before a thorough, transparent and data-driven investigation is both premature and irresponsible,” the pilots’ association said, adding that selective use of cockpit recordings can unfairly cast doubt on professional reputations.

Some US pilots who reviewed the Indian report argue that it’s hard to imagine the first officer, who was busy handling the controls during take-off, would have reached over for the fuel switches. Instead, all eyes are on the captain’s actions in those fateful moments.

Meanwhile, families are left with more questions than answers. With only one survivor from the crash, most of those who could shed light on the flight’s final seconds are tragically gone.

Do Cockpit cameras hold the key?

All of this has reignited a debate that’s been rumbling for years in the world of aviation: should cockpits be fitted with cameras? On one side, supporters say video footage could provide crucial evidence, clearing up exactly what happened during incidents like this one. On the other, pilots warn that cameras might invade their privacy, and that the footage could be misused.

Aviation safety expert John Nance argues that, in this case, “video would have been invaluable”—not just for investigators, but also for helping families understand what happened to their loved ones. For now, though, authorities are forced to rely on audio, flight data, and the professionalism of the crew.

Aviation safety in the spotlight and the human factor

What happened on Air India Flight 171 was, by any measure, a tragedy. But it’s also a reminder that flying is as much about people as it is about technology. Even with the most modern planes and rigorous training, a split-second mistake—or a moment of confusion—can have unthinkable consequences.

For now, the investigation continues, and everyone involved is hoping for answers, not just blame. After all, when you put your life in someone else’s hands at 35,000 feet, you want to know every possible lesson is being learned.

Read more World news