The company reported a massive 163% jump in consolidated net profit for the March quarter at Rs 36.8 crore, compared with Rs 14 crore in the same quarter last year. Revenue from operations soared 81% year-on-year to Rs 293.3 crore from Rs 161.8 crore.
For the full financial year FY26, Apollo Micro Systems delivered stellar growth across key metrics. Consolidated profit climbed 90% to Rs 107.4 crore from Rs 56.4 crore in FY25, while revenue from operations surged 61% to Rs 904.3 crore against Rs 562.1 crore a year ago.
Adding further strength to its outlook, the company’s consolidated order book stood at Rs 1,432 crore as of March 31, 2026, highlighting strong business visibility ahead.
Commenting on the performance, Managing Director Baddam Karunakar Reddy said FY26 was a “breakthrough year” for the company, marked by record revenue and profitability, the successful completion of the IDL Explosives acquisition through ADIPL, receipt of the DPIIT license for UAV manufacturing, and the company’s first export order.
He also revealed that another acquisition through ADIPL is expected to be completed before the end of the next financial year, which could further strengthen the company’s growth trajectory and business capabilities.
The stock has been a multibagger performer, rallying an impressive 141% over the past year. Apollo Micro Systems currently commands a market capitalisation of Rs 11,111 crore, while its 52-week high stands at Rs 354.70.On the valuation front, the stock trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 124.43 and a price-to-book (P/B) ratio of 15.69, indicating premium market valuations amid strong growth expectations.
Technically, the momentum remains bullish. According to Trendlyne data, the stock’s RSI (14) stands at 61.6, a level that suggests positive momentum without entering overbought territory. The stock is also trading above all eight key simple moving averages (SMAs), reinforcing the ongoing bullish trend.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
